Book Reviews: When books go wrong

I usually post reviews of books I either rate highly or think had strong points of interest even if they didn't quite stick the landing, but I thought it might be fun to look at four books I have started but not finished over the past six months because I just did like them at all. DNFs are rare for me, I tend to stubbornly hang in even if a book is meh, but these four broke me, all in very different ways. This was a DNF at 52%. The reason I stopped: I found Langley's approach to document analysis ahistorical, naïve, and almost laughably partisan. I guess I should not have been surprised, given how strongly Langley feels about Richard, and it's not to cast any shade on her earlier massive achievement of discovering Richard's body, but this book, and the project it reports on, is seriously flawed. Discovering new documentary references that may refer to the princes (or to the pretenders) in Europe is interesting indeed, but the interpretation she puts on these fragments ...